The Americans captured a considerable amount of war supplies, including a cannon used against the British at Saratoga in 1777, which had been taken from Fort Detroit when Hull surrendered in 1812.
More important, Tecumseh's death broke the American Indian coalition's back-- in fact, some of the northwestern tribes signed treaties that obligated them to fight against their old ally, Great Britain.
Though the War of 1812 was far from over, the Battle of the Thames turned the tide in the West and had secured the whole region for the United States.
For the Indians, it was a double disaster.
--Brock-Perry
Monday, May 30, 2016
Thursday, May 26, 2016
The Frontier in Flames-- Part 24: Death of Tecumseh
Tecumseh was killed in the fighting at the Battle of the Thames. However, historians disagree about how he died or what happened to his body. Richard Johnson claimed he had killed Tecumseh and was hailed as a war hero.
A number of soldiers claimed that they had helped mutilate the chief's body for souvenirs, though these boasts were never substantiated.
--Brock-Perry
A number of soldiers claimed that they had helped mutilate the chief's body for souvenirs, though these boasts were never substantiated.
--Brock-Perry
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
John H. Dent, USN-- Part 2
During the War of 1812, he was senior officer in charge of U.S. Naval affairs in Charleston, S.C..
He married in South Carolina and made it his home and is buried in Jacksonboro, South Carolina.
From another source:
John H. Dent commanded the USS Hornet from 1801-1809, took a cruise to the Mediterranean Sea and served on the Hornet while acting as senior naval officer in Charleston, S.C. He next commanded the USS John Adams and operated along the southern U.S. coast and in 1811, took a voyage to Europe.
Promoted to captain in 1811 and was sent back to Charleston to serve as commandant of the naval station there and the one in Wilmington, North Carolina. he held this post during the entire War of 1812.
--Brock-Perry
He married in South Carolina and made it his home and is buried in Jacksonboro, South Carolina.
From another source:
John H. Dent commanded the USS Hornet from 1801-1809, took a cruise to the Mediterranean Sea and served on the Hornet while acting as senior naval officer in Charleston, S.C. He next commanded the USS John Adams and operated along the southern U.S. coast and in 1811, took a voyage to Europe.
Promoted to captain in 1811 and was sent back to Charleston to serve as commandant of the naval station there and the one in Wilmington, North Carolina. he held this post during the entire War of 1812.
--Brock-Perry
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
John H. Dent, USN-- Part 1
From Wikipedia.
I wrote about the destroyer USS Dent in today's Tattooed on Your Soul: World War II Blog.
(15 February 1782 to 31 July 1823.
Officer U.S. Navy in Quasi-War, First Barbary War and War of 1812. he was acting captain of the USS Constitution during the attacks on Tripoli in 1804. Born in Maryland, the son of Congressman and Revolutionary War officer George Dent.
Appointed Midshipman 16 March 1794.Served on the USS Constellation when it captured the French frigate Insurgente in 1799. Then served on the USS Constitution in the Mediterranean and later commanded the schooners Nautilus and Scourge during the First Barbary War.
More to Come. --Brock-Perry
I wrote about the destroyer USS Dent in today's Tattooed on Your Soul: World War II Blog.
(15 February 1782 to 31 July 1823.
Officer U.S. Navy in Quasi-War, First Barbary War and War of 1812. he was acting captain of the USS Constitution during the attacks on Tripoli in 1804. Born in Maryland, the son of Congressman and Revolutionary War officer George Dent.
Appointed Midshipman 16 March 1794.Served on the USS Constellation when it captured the French frigate Insurgente in 1799. Then served on the USS Constitution in the Mediterranean and later commanded the schooners Nautilus and Scourge during the First Barbary War.
More to Come. --Brock-Perry
The Frontier in Flames-- Part 23: Battle of the Thames
William Henry Harrison, meanwhile, had a well-provisioned and motivated army of about 3,000 men. They landed in Canada in late September and headed up the Thames River in pursuit of Henry Proctor. The forces met on October 5,1813. Proctor had his forced arrayed in two lines, with the small swamp in front of them.
Eyeing the battlefield ground, Harrison's cavalry leader, Richard M. Johnson of Kentucky, proposed a cavalry charge against each of the British lines -- an unusual tactic in such a situation.
Harrison agreed. Johnson attacked the British right, which was held by Tecumseh and his Indians, while Johnson's brother, James, attacked the British left. The surprise maneuver broke the British lines and set up a deadly crossfire that forced their surrender.
--Brock-Perry
Eyeing the battlefield ground, Harrison's cavalry leader, Richard M. Johnson of Kentucky, proposed a cavalry charge against each of the British lines -- an unusual tactic in such a situation.
Harrison agreed. Johnson attacked the British right, which was held by Tecumseh and his Indians, while Johnson's brother, James, attacked the British left. The surprise maneuver broke the British lines and set up a deadly crossfire that forced their surrender.
--Brock-Perry
Monday, May 23, 2016
The Frontier In Flames-- Part 22: A Last Stand at Moraviantown
Instead, Proctor suggested moving a few miles farther upstream on the Thames River to Moraviantown, which could be more easily defended. A river would protect one flank of the British Army, a large swamp shielded the other and there was a small swamp directly in front of British lines which would necessitate the Americans to divide their forces in an attack.
It was a desperate move. The men were hungry, tired and dispirited. Proctor's force comprised 800 militia and regulars; some 1,200 warriors when it began its march, but as many as 700 had left ranks since the retreat had begun.
--Brock-Perry
It was a desperate move. The men were hungry, tired and dispirited. Proctor's force comprised 800 militia and regulars; some 1,200 warriors when it began its march, but as many as 700 had left ranks since the retreat had begun.
--Brock-Perry
The Frontier in Flames-- Part 21: Leading Up to the Battle of the Thames
Furious, Tecumseh accused Proctor of cowardice and vowed to remain and fight. "We must compare our Father's [Proctor's] conduct to a fat animal that carries its tail upon its back, but when affrighted, it drops it between its legs and runs off," Tecumseh angrily told Proctor.
Knowing how important Tecumseh's warriors were to his side, Henry Proctor tried to sooth him by proposing relocating to present-day Chatham, Ontario, and fortifying it and making a stand against advancing Americans. Tecumseah agreed, but when he arrived at Chatham he was stunned to find it unfortified.
--Brock-Perry
Knowing how important Tecumseh's warriors were to his side, Henry Proctor tried to sooth him by proposing relocating to present-day Chatham, Ontario, and fortifying it and making a stand against advancing Americans. Tecumseah agreed, but when he arrived at Chatham he was stunned to find it unfortified.
--Brock-Perry
Friday, May 20, 2016
The Frontier in Flames-- Part 20: Leading Up to the Battle of the Thames
While American soldiers had struggled with little success on land, U.S,. naval forces under Oliver hazard Perry won control of Lake Erie at the Battle of Lake Erie in early fall 1813, effectively cutting Proctor's main supply lines which ran through the lake.
When Proctor learned that Harrison and Perry were preparing for a major invasion of Canada, he decided to leave Fort Malden and withdraw up the Thames River farther into Upper Canada (Ontario).
--Brock-Perry
When Proctor learned that Harrison and Perry were preparing for a major invasion of Canada, he decided to leave Fort Malden and withdraw up the Thames River farther into Upper Canada (Ontario).
--Brock-Perry
The Frontier in Flames-- Part 19: Why These Posts
I have been taking this directly from the September/October issue of the DAR's American Spirit magazine. I have written about many of these actions and gone into greater detail, but I find this to be a good summary of events.
--Brock-Perry
--Brock-Perry
Thursday, May 19, 2016
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 18: Last British Offensive in Northwest Territory
Proctor and Tecumseh tried again in late July to take Fort Meigs with a combined force of 5,000 regulars, militia and Indians. They tried to lure the Americans out of the fort by staging a mock battle, hoping they would think that a relief column had been ambushed. But the defenders were not fooled and stayed in the fort.
On August 2, Proctor sent 400 regulars and militia, plus a number of his tribal allies to attack Fort Stephenson, a small outpost on the Sanduskey River commanded by George Croghan. Though garrisoned by only 160 men, the fort was surrounded by a deep ditch that slowed the attackers, making them perfect targets for the Kentucky sharpshooters inside the fort.
Thwarted, Proctor again withdrew to Fort Malden in Canada, and abandoned Detroit, the recovery of which had caused so much death and suffering.
This campaign was the last major British attack on the Northwest Territory.
--Brock-Perry
On August 2, Proctor sent 400 regulars and militia, plus a number of his tribal allies to attack Fort Stephenson, a small outpost on the Sanduskey River commanded by George Croghan. Though garrisoned by only 160 men, the fort was surrounded by a deep ditch that slowed the attackers, making them perfect targets for the Kentucky sharpshooters inside the fort.
Thwarted, Proctor again withdrew to Fort Malden in Canada, and abandoned Detroit, the recovery of which had caused so much death and suffering.
This campaign was the last major British attack on the Northwest Territory.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 17: The Battle of Fort Meigs; "Go On and Put On Petticoats"
As happened before, some of the American prisoners were tortured, mutilated and killed. Tecumseh tried unsuccessfully to halt the butchery. When Proctor proved either unable or unwilling to stop it, Tecumseh supposedly told him, "Begone! You are unfit to command; go on and put on petticoats."
Though the British were numerically superior, the siege was effectively over by May 9, when the Indians began to leave. The Canadian militiamen also left, saying they needed to go home to plant their spring crops.
The British lost about 100 men, compared with 320 Americans killed and wounded and some 600 captured. (This does not include Indians fighting on the American side as their casualties were rarely counted.
--Brock-Perry
Though the British were numerically superior, the siege was effectively over by May 9, when the Indians began to leave. The Canadian militiamen also left, saying they needed to go home to plant their spring crops.
The British lost about 100 men, compared with 320 Americans killed and wounded and some 600 captured. (This does not include Indians fighting on the American side as their casualties were rarely counted.
--Brock-Perry
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 16: British Offensive in April 1813: Fighting at Fort Meigs
In late April 1813, the weather was good enough for campaigning again. British General Henry Proctor headed south to attack Fort Meigs with 900 British regulars and Canadian militia, and 1,200 Canadian and American Indians led by Tecumseh and Wyandot Chief Roundhead.
There were only 550 Americans in the fort when Proctor arrived, but his first assault failed. He then tried bombarding the fort, but its strong walls easily withstood the cannon fire.
On May 5, William Henry Harrison arrived with a 1,200-man relief force composed mostly of Kentuckians. They dispersed the British but their undisciplined pursuit of the enemy led to nearly half of them being killed, wounded or taken prisoner.
--Brock-Perry
There were only 550 Americans in the fort when Proctor arrived, but his first assault failed. He then tried bombarding the fort, but its strong walls easily withstood the cannon fire.
On May 5, William Henry Harrison arrived with a 1,200-man relief force composed mostly of Kentuckians. They dispersed the British but their undisciplined pursuit of the enemy led to nearly half of them being killed, wounded or taken prisoner.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier In Flames-- Part 15: Harrison in a Bind, But Still Destroying Indian Villages
Wintering at Fort Meigs on the Maumee River (today's Perrysburg, Ohio), William Henry Harrison held a precarious front and knew spring would bring a renewed British offensive.
Harrison had attacked and burned American Indian villages along his line of march north and continued sending out raiding parties to destroy other Indian villages.
--Brock-Perry
Harrison had attacked and burned American Indian villages along his line of march north and continued sending out raiding parties to destroy other Indian villages.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier In Flames-- Part 14: The Raisin River Massacre
Henry Proctor left between 60 and 80 badly wounded Americans and took the rest of his prisoners back to Detroit.
What happened next is known as the Raisin River Massacre. A group of warriors returned to Frenchtown and killed and scalped at least 30 of the wounded soldiers and took others away as prisoners. Some of the Americans escaped and made their way to Harrison's Army.
The Raisin River massacre was another major defeat for the United States in the Northwest. At the end of 1812, the British and their allies had taken control of previously American territory in Michigan, Illinois, northern Indiana and northwestern Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
What happened next is known as the Raisin River Massacre. A group of warriors returned to Frenchtown and killed and scalped at least 30 of the wounded soldiers and took others away as prisoners. Some of the Americans escaped and made their way to Harrison's Army.
The Raisin River massacre was another major defeat for the United States in the Northwest. At the end of 1812, the British and their allies had taken control of previously American territory in Michigan, Illinois, northern Indiana and northwestern Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 13: The Battle of Frenchtown
Instead of waiting for Harrison, however, James Winchester marched on Frenchtown after refugees from the town begged him to drive off the British. Winchester's smaller force of about 850 men routed Proctor's army in the initial phase of the battle, but did not take precautions for counter attack.
It soon came.
Proctor's force then overwhelmed the Americans and captured Winchester. Believing that further resistance would lead to a massacre of prisoners, Winchester then surrendered.
Though victorious, Proctor had lost nearly a third of his force and decided to abandon Frenchtown.
--Brock-Perry
It soon came.
Proctor's force then overwhelmed the Americans and captured Winchester. Believing that further resistance would lead to a massacre of prisoners, Winchester then surrendered.
Though victorious, Proctor had lost nearly a third of his force and decided to abandon Frenchtown.
--Brock-Perry
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 12: Events Leading to the Raisin River Massacre
The fall of Detroit and Dearborn Massacre outraged America. Seeking revenge, in late 1812, William Henry Harrison led a 9,000-man army through Indiana to recapture Fort Detroit. A smaller, second American force was led by James Winchester was supposed to meet Harrison at the Maumee River near the border of Indiana and Michigan.
Colonel Henry Proctor had replaced General Brock, who had been killed at the Battle of Queenstown Heights, as commander of the British forces. Rather than to allow Harrison to reach Detroit, Procter took an army of about 1,100 regulars, militia and American Indians south.
They captured Frenchtown (now Monroe, Michigan), on the Raisin River and dug in to await the Americans.
--Brock-Perry
Colonel Henry Proctor had replaced General Brock, who had been killed at the Battle of Queenstown Heights, as commander of the British forces. Rather than to allow Harrison to reach Detroit, Procter took an army of about 1,100 regulars, militia and American Indians south.
They captured Frenchtown (now Monroe, Michigan), on the Raisin River and dug in to await the Americans.
--Brock-Perry
Monday, May 16, 2016
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 11: Fort Dearborn Surrender and Massacre
A few days before he surrendered Detroit, William Hull had sent orders to Captain Nathan Heald at Fort Dearborn (present-day Chicago) to abandon the outpost because Hull did not think it could be defended against the enemy (and especially the Indians).
When Hull's orders arrived, Fort Dearborn was surrounded by about 500 hostile Potawatomi warriors. Heald was reluctant to surrender, but also did not want to disobey orders. Like Hull, he also asked for, and was promised safe passage.
But, before leaving the fort, Heald had his men destroy stores of whiskey and guns. Furious at losing these prizes, the Potawatomi ambushed the departing Americans. there were about 65 soldiers and militia and two dozen women and children.
Most were killed outright, but some were taken prisoner only to be viciously tortured and killed later.
--Brock-Perry
When Hull's orders arrived, Fort Dearborn was surrounded by about 500 hostile Potawatomi warriors. Heald was reluctant to surrender, but also did not want to disobey orders. Like Hull, he also asked for, and was promised safe passage.
But, before leaving the fort, Heald had his men destroy stores of whiskey and guns. Furious at losing these prizes, the Potawatomi ambushed the departing Americans. there were about 65 soldiers and militia and two dozen women and children.
Most were killed outright, but some were taken prisoner only to be viciously tortured and killed later.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 10: The Surrender of Detroit
When American General William Hull refused to surrender, the British shelled Fort Detroit and prepared to attack. At this time, Hull lost his courage. Although the fort was strong and well-equipped to withstand a siege, he decided to surrender.
This was due in large part to fear of Indian atrocities if he fought and lost. British General Brock assured him that he he couldn't control his Indian allies if it came to a fight. In addition, Hull had his family along with him.
On August 16, 1812, he agreed to surrender in exchange for promises of safe conduct back to the U.S. for his soldiers and civilians.
Hull and his party safely left the fort and returned home, where he was court-martialed for cowardice.
--Brock-Perry
This was due in large part to fear of Indian atrocities if he fought and lost. British General Brock assured him that he he couldn't control his Indian allies if it came to a fight. In addition, Hull had his family along with him.
On August 16, 1812, he agreed to surrender in exchange for promises of safe conduct back to the U.S. for his soldiers and civilians.
Hull and his party safely left the fort and returned home, where he was court-martialed for cowardice.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames-- Part 9: Bad Luck William Hull
Before officially declaring war, President James Madison sent General William Hull with a 2,000-man army to Fort Detroit to be in position to invade Canada right away. Hull's plan was to cross from Detroit and attack British Fort Malden near Anherstburg at the southern tip of the modern province of Ontario. from there, he would move on to the provincial capital of Upper Canada, York (today's Toronto).
But, he moved slowly and, by luck, British forces at Fort Malden learned of his plans when they captured the Detroit-bound American ship, the Cayahoga, carrying Hull's personal baggage and his plans.
Led by one of the British Army's most outstanding generals, Isaac Brock, the British had time to prepare. Gen. Hull did cross over into Canada, but the British and Canadians cut Hull's supply lines and forced him to take refuge back in Detroit, where they demanded his surrender.
Isaac Brock is One of the Names Used In This Blog's Sign-Off. --Brock-Perry
But, he moved slowly and, by luck, British forces at Fort Malden learned of his plans when they captured the Detroit-bound American ship, the Cayahoga, carrying Hull's personal baggage and his plans.
Led by one of the British Army's most outstanding generals, Isaac Brock, the British had time to prepare. Gen. Hull did cross over into Canada, but the British and Canadians cut Hull's supply lines and forced him to take refuge back in Detroit, where they demanded his surrender.
Isaac Brock is One of the Names Used In This Blog's Sign-Off. --Brock-Perry
Friday, May 13, 2016
A Frontier in Flames: War Along the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 8: Impact of the Battle of Tippecanoe
To many, the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811 was the first battle of the War of 1812, though the war was not to be declared until June of the following year. Historians differ on the impact the battle had on Tecumseh's confederacy. Some say it weakened the alliance, while others say that this was propaganda spread by Harrison who lost twenty percent of his force.
In any event, attacks on American settlers intensified rather than decreased after the battle, which was immortalized in the slogan "Tippecanoe and Tyler, Too!" when Harrison ran for president in 1840.
--Brock-Perry
In any event, attacks on American settlers intensified rather than decreased after the battle, which was immortalized in the slogan "Tippecanoe and Tyler, Too!" when Harrison ran for president in 1840.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames: War on the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 7: The Battle of Tippecanoe
In November 1811, William Henry Harrison led a force of about 1,000 regular troops and militia against Prophet's Town. Tecumseh was not there as he was in the American South trying to rally the Creek and Choctow tribes to his cause.
The Americans camped near the town on the night of November 6 when the Prophet launched a surprise attack. There was bitter fighting, but the Americans held their ground and eventually repelled the attack.
Harrison counter-attacked the next day and captured Prophet's Town. Supplies of food and weapons were destroyed and the town torched. Reports had the Americans scalping the dead warriors in revenge for the scalping of Americans the night before.
--Brock-Perry
Thursday, May 12, 2016
A Frontier in Flames, War On the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 6: Tensions Between Indians and Whites
Tecumseh protested that the tribes had no authority to sell the land, which was commonly held. In August 1810, he and a band of several hundred warriors met with William Henry Harrison at the governor's home. Grouseland, in Vincennes, Indiana Territory.
Tecumseh demanded that Harrison rescind the Treaty of Fort Wayne, which the governor refused to do. The discussion grew more and more heated. At the end, Tecumseh warned Harrison that if the treaty stood, they would ally with the British.
Attacks on American settlers began to increase in what was known as Tecumseh's War. Harrison asked for federal troops to help restore order.
--Brock-Perry
Tecumseh demanded that Harrison rescind the Treaty of Fort Wayne, which the governor refused to do. The discussion grew more and more heated. At the end, Tecumseh warned Harrison that if the treaty stood, they would ally with the British.
Attacks on American settlers began to increase in what was known as Tecumseh's War. Harrison asked for federal troops to help restore order.
--Brock-Perry
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
A Frontier in Flames, Confrontation On the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 5: Tensions and Treaty of Fort Wayne
In 1808, Tecumseh and his brother, "The Prophet" established "Prophet's Town," a settlement at the confluence of the Wabash and Tippecanoe rivers in Indiana. As tensions between the Indians and Americans continued to mount, they attracted a large following to their new village.
Tecumseh and his brother were preaching resistance. At the same time, Territorial Governor William Henry Harrison was pushing for expansion just as hard. In 1809, Harrison negotiated the Treaty of Fort Wayne where a number of tribes, including the Delaware, Shawnee, Potawatomi, Miami and Kickapoo transferred some 3 million acres of tribal land to the United States.
--Brock-Perry
A Frontier in Flames, War Along the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 4: Tecumseh and "The Prophet"
In 1805, Tecumseh's one-eyed brother Lalawethica, who was called the "Prophet," had a dream in which he felt called upon to preach a spiritual revival of the tribes.
He and Tecumseh traveled widely urging tribes to foresake white customs such as drinking alcohol; to resume ancient practices; and, above all else, refuse to sell land to the Americans. Tecumseh was renowned as a charismatic, eloquent leader and diplomacy, and worked to create a new confederacy of tribes that would resist American expansion.
This set him on a direct path to confrontation with the U.S, which would stand for nothing stopping its Manifest Destiny.
--Brock-Perry
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
A Frontier in Flames, War Along the U.S.-Canadian Frontier-- Part 3: Tecumseh Takes a Stand
Even without British meddling, Americans and Indians had long been on a collision course as American expansion accelerated. They were pressed to sell or cede more and more of their traditional land. Indian resentment grew.
Matters reached a flashpoint with the rise of two powerful leaders in the early 1800s-- the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh and American William Henry Harrison who served as territorial governor from mid-1800 to the end of 1812.
Tecumseh was born in 1768 in Ohio. His name means "Shooting Star." his father was killed in a battle with whites in 1774. Tecumseh began fighting against white expansion at least 20 years before the War of 1812. he was part of the Indian force that defeated General Arthur St. Clair on November 4, 1791, in Indiana. He also fought at the Battle of Fallen Timbers on August 20, 1794, which ended an Indian alliance known as the Pan-Indian Movement.
--Brock-Perry
Matters reached a flashpoint with the rise of two powerful leaders in the early 1800s-- the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh and American William Henry Harrison who served as territorial governor from mid-1800 to the end of 1812.
Tecumseh was born in 1768 in Ohio. His name means "Shooting Star." his father was killed in a battle with whites in 1774. Tecumseh began fighting against white expansion at least 20 years before the War of 1812. he was part of the Indian force that defeated General Arthur St. Clair on November 4, 1791, in Indiana. He also fought at the Battle of Fallen Timbers on August 20, 1794, which ended an Indian alliance known as the Pan-Indian Movement.
--Brock-Perry
Monday, May 9, 2016
A Frontier in Flames, War Along the U.S.-Canadian Border-- Part 1: An Outgrowth of the American Revolution
From the September/October American Spirit magazine, Daughters of the American Revolution "A Frontier in Flames" by Bill Hudgins.
One of the major issues of the War of 1812 for the United States was Great Britain's continued presence and interference along the United States'northwestern border and the Canadian province of Upper Canada, which stretched along the great Lakes.
At the end of the American Revolution, there were seven major British outposts in the United States new Northwest Territory. (present-day Indiana, Illinois,Michigan and Wisconsin). They were involved in the lucrative fur trade and had contact with American Indians.
The 1783 Treaty of Paris required the British to give up these outposts, but it took them a decade to do it. Even worse, they encouraged the Indians to resist westward expansion of the Americans.
--Brock-Perry
One of the major issues of the War of 1812 for the United States was Great Britain's continued presence and interference along the United States'northwestern border and the Canadian province of Upper Canada, which stretched along the great Lakes.
At the end of the American Revolution, there were seven major British outposts in the United States new Northwest Territory. (present-day Indiana, Illinois,Michigan and Wisconsin). They were involved in the lucrative fur trade and had contact with American Indians.
The 1783 Treaty of Paris required the British to give up these outposts, but it took them a decade to do it. Even worse, they encouraged the Indians to resist westward expansion of the Americans.
--Brock-Perry
Sunday, May 8, 2016
A Frontier in Flames, War Along the U.S. Canadian Border-- Part 2: Early Losses Followed By American Victories
When war was declared, it was only natural that this area become the major battlefield.
On paper, it looked like an uneven contest. The United States had more than 7.5 million people compared to just 500,000 in Canada. Plus, Great Britain was in a battle for its life in Europe with Napoleon, leaving no extra troops to sent to North America.
The defenses of Canada were left in the hands of British troops already stationed there, along with Canadian militia and a coalition of American Indian tribes. The Indians were crucial, but proved to be difficult allies. they pretty much did as they pleased, but their very presence terrified Americans.
However, the Americans suffered from poor military leadership which led to a series of humiliating, bloody losses in the latter half of 1812 and early 1813. Several of these defeats were followed by the massacre of American prisoners by the Indians, as well as by atrocities by both sides.
The tide began to turn in the U.S. favor in 1813 as new leaders such as Winfield Scott, Zebulon Pike and William Henry Harrison replaced the older commanders. Following the death of tecumseh, on October 5, 1813, the tribal coalition collapsed, effectively ending British attacks into the Northwest Territory.
--Brock-Perry
On paper, it looked like an uneven contest. The United States had more than 7.5 million people compared to just 500,000 in Canada. Plus, Great Britain was in a battle for its life in Europe with Napoleon, leaving no extra troops to sent to North America.
The defenses of Canada were left in the hands of British troops already stationed there, along with Canadian militia and a coalition of American Indian tribes. The Indians were crucial, but proved to be difficult allies. they pretty much did as they pleased, but their very presence terrified Americans.
However, the Americans suffered from poor military leadership which led to a series of humiliating, bloody losses in the latter half of 1812 and early 1813. Several of these defeats were followed by the massacre of American prisoners by the Indians, as well as by atrocities by both sides.
The tide began to turn in the U.S. favor in 1813 as new leaders such as Winfield Scott, Zebulon Pike and William Henry Harrison replaced the older commanders. Following the death of tecumseh, on October 5, 1813, the tribal coalition collapsed, effectively ending British attacks into the Northwest Territory.
--Brock-Perry
Friday, May 6, 2016
James Poage-- Part 5: Burial
From Find-A-Grave.
James Poage is buried at the Old Ripley Cemetery in Ripley, Ohio.
A lot of Poages are buried there.
It is located at 5th and Cherry Street.
--Brock-Perry
James Poage is buried at the Old Ripley Cemetery in Ripley, Ohio.
A lot of Poages are buried there.
It is located at 5th and Cherry Street.
--Brock-Perry
James Poage, Founder of Ripley, Ohio-- Part 4: Freed His Slaves
From Pogue/Poage Family in Black and White.
James Crawford Poage/Pogue founded the town of Ripley, Ohio, on the Ohio River.
In 1790, he became convinced that it was a sin to own slaves and he moved his family to the Ohio side of the Ohio River where slavery was illegal. he brought his family and 20 slaves with him. He freed them once in Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
James Crawford Poage/Pogue founded the town of Ripley, Ohio, on the Ohio River.
In 1790, he became convinced that it was a sin to own slaves and he moved his family to the Ohio side of the Ohio River where slavery was illegal. he brought his family and 20 slaves with him. He freed them once in Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
Thursday, May 5, 2016
James Poage, Founder of Ripley, Ohio-- Part 3: Ripley, Not Staunton
Kentucky was admitted to the United States as a slave state and Ohio as a free state. Ripley, following James Poage's lead,became a major stop on the Underground Railroad, also because of the town's location on the Ohio River. Once across that, runaway slaves were somewhat safe.
Poage initially called Ripley Buck's Landing and a few months later decided it could be a good place to establish a town. He surveyed it, cleared it and plotted it, deciding it would be named in honor of the town he was born in in Virginia, Staunton.
James Poage was well-known for his dislike of slavery and like-minded people began moving there. By 1816, the town had 100 residents, but they found there was already a town in Ohio named Staunton, so the name was changed to honor War of 1812 General Eleazor Wheelock Ripley.
--Brock-Perry
Poage initially called Ripley Buck's Landing and a few months later decided it could be a good place to establish a town. He surveyed it, cleared it and plotted it, deciding it would be named in honor of the town he was born in in Virginia, Staunton.
James Poage was well-known for his dislike of slavery and like-minded people began moving there. By 1816, the town had 100 residents, but they found there was already a town in Ohio named Staunton, so the name was changed to honor War of 1812 General Eleazor Wheelock Ripley.
--Brock-Perry
James Poage, Founder of Ripley, Ohio-- Part 2: Land Grants
From Touring Ohio.
James Poage, 44, arrived in Ohio by flatboat in 1804 to lay claim to 1000 acres of land he received for fighting for Virginia in the American Revolution in what was known as the Virginia Military District . He came with his wife. 10 children and all of his possessions.
Poage was already a titled land owner in Kentucky as he surveyed in parts of Virginia, Kentucky and Illinois. Back then, the lead surveyors were usually paid with land. Plus, he was given the title of colonel, a title reflecting the dangers and military regimen of the surveying teams.
He was a former slave owner, but had come to abhor slavery and decided not to live in Kentucky, a slave state. He moved his family to what became Ripley, Ohio, one reason why it became so important in the Underground Railroad.
--Brock-Perry
James Poage, 44, arrived in Ohio by flatboat in 1804 to lay claim to 1000 acres of land he received for fighting for Virginia in the American Revolution in what was known as the Virginia Military District . He came with his wife. 10 children and all of his possessions.
Poage was already a titled land owner in Kentucky as he surveyed in parts of Virginia, Kentucky and Illinois. Back then, the lead surveyors were usually paid with land. Plus, he was given the title of colonel, a title reflecting the dangers and military regimen of the surveying teams.
He was a former slave owner, but had come to abhor slavery and decided not to live in Kentucky, a slave state. He moved his family to what became Ripley, Ohio, one reason why it became so important in the Underground Railroad.
--Brock-Perry
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
James Poage, Founder of Ripley, Ohio-- Part 1: Served in the American Revolution
From the Grether Family Extended on Roots World Connection.
In my April 15, 2016, blog entry, I wrote about James Poage (also sometimes spelled Pouge) as being the founder of Ripley, Ohio.
James Poage was born in 1760 in Augusta County, Virginia. he died 19 April 1820 in Ripley, Ohio.
He was a surveyor, farmer and trapper.
During the American Revolution he was a lieutenant in the Augusta County militia.
Later he was the county surveyor of Pochahontas County as well as a farmer, Indian trader and founder of Ripley, Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
In my April 15, 2016, blog entry, I wrote about James Poage (also sometimes spelled Pouge) as being the founder of Ripley, Ohio.
James Poage was born in 1760 in Augusta County, Virginia. he died 19 April 1820 in Ripley, Ohio.
He was a surveyor, farmer and trapper.
During the American Revolution he was a lieutenant in the Augusta County militia.
Later he was the county surveyor of Pochahontas County as well as a farmer, Indian trader and founder of Ripley, Ohio.
--Brock-Perry
Mass Graves in Ontario Give Archaeologists Clues As to Buckshot Wounds-- Part 2
Using staple isotopes analysis showed that some of the remains had a more European diet and others more of a North American one, suggesting that soldiers from both sides were buried together in the mass grave.
Three of the individuals' hip bones had injuries consistent with musket shot.
A team of researchers at McMaster University in Canada recreated likeness of humans and reproductions of War of 1812 muskets and tested shots.
Buck and ball consists of a large musket ball and three smaller buckshot pellets.
Injuries on the bones were found to be more often caused by the buckshot.
--Brock-Perry
Three of the individuals' hip bones had injuries consistent with musket shot.
A team of researchers at McMaster University in Canada recreated likeness of humans and reproductions of War of 1812 muskets and tested shots.
Buck and ball consists of a large musket ball and three smaller buckshot pellets.
Injuries on the bones were found to be more often caused by the buckshot.
--Brock-Perry
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
Mass Graves in Ontario Give Archaeologists Clues As to Buckshot Wounds-- Part 1
From the April 4, 2016, Forbes magazine "Mass Grave From War of 1812 Gives Archaeologists First Evidence of Buckshot Injuries" by Kristina Killgrove.
On June 6, 1813, American troops advanced into the Niagara Peninsula. The British attacked their camp at Stoney Creek in Ontario. The action ended up a close-range one of hand-to-hand combat.
A mass grave was later found that contained two dozen skeletons and was excavated between 1998 and 1999. It contained 2,701 bone fragments of at least 24 bodies. Losses from the battle amounted to 23 British and 17 Americans with over 200 injured, missing or captured.
--Brock-Perry
On June 6, 1813, American troops advanced into the Niagara Peninsula. The British attacked their camp at Stoney Creek in Ontario. The action ended up a close-range one of hand-to-hand combat.
A mass grave was later found that contained two dozen skeletons and was excavated between 1998 and 1999. It contained 2,701 bone fragments of at least 24 bodies. Losses from the battle amounted to 23 British and 17 Americans with over 200 injured, missing or captured.
--Brock-Perry
Mendon Man Had Hand in Treaty of Ghent
From April 30, 2016, Wicked Local Mendon (Massachusetts)
Jonathan Russell II was one of the five U.S. commissioners who negotiated the Treaty of Ghent, ending the War of 1812.
A quiz on Jonathan Russell II accompanies the article. I didn't take take it. I'd never heard of him before.
Russell was born on February 27, 1771, in Providence, Rhode Island. He graduated from the University of Rhode Island , studied law, but didn't practice. He was noted for his orator skills.
President Madison appointed him charge d'affaires in Paris in 1810 and the next year the same position in London. From 1814 to 1818, he was minister to Sweden and Norway.
The other U.S. negotiators were John Quincy Adams, James A. Bayard, Henry Clay and Albert Gallatin. Only Russell and Clay voted against the treaty.
--Brock-Perry
Jonathan Russell II was one of the five U.S. commissioners who negotiated the Treaty of Ghent, ending the War of 1812.
A quiz on Jonathan Russell II accompanies the article. I didn't take take it. I'd never heard of him before.
Russell was born on February 27, 1771, in Providence, Rhode Island. He graduated from the University of Rhode Island , studied law, but didn't practice. He was noted for his orator skills.
President Madison appointed him charge d'affaires in Paris in 1810 and the next year the same position in London. From 1814 to 1818, he was minister to Sweden and Norway.
The other U.S. negotiators were John Quincy Adams, James A. Bayard, Henry Clay and Albert Gallatin. Only Russell and Clay voted against the treaty.
--Brock-Perry
Monday, May 2, 2016
Last Survivor of the Battle of Fort Stephenson-- Part 3: Participated in Black Hawk War and the Civil War.
After the battle, William Gaines returned to Fort Seneca until after the news of Perry's victory at the Battle of Lake Erie. They marched past Fort Stephenson, got into boats and crossed over into Canada.
They landed at Colonel Elliot's wharf and from there went to Fort Malden, then to Sand Beach and on October 5, fought at the Battle of the Thames.
Gaines remained with the Army after the war and participated in the Black Hawk War.
During the Civil War, he was in charge of the quartermaster's store at the Madison Barracks in New York.
--Brock-Perry
They landed at Colonel Elliot's wharf and from there went to Fort Malden, then to Sand Beach and on October 5, fought at the Battle of the Thames.
Gaines remained with the Army after the war and participated in the Black Hawk War.
During the Civil War, he was in charge of the quartermaster's store at the Madison Barracks in New York.
--Brock-Perry
Last Survivor of the Battle of Fort Stephenson-- Part 2: Thurman Gets His Head Blown Off
On July 18, 1812, William Gaines, then age 13, enlisted as a drummer boy in Captain Armstrong's Company of the 24th Infantry.
In June 1812, they were at Fort Meigs and in July at Fort Seneca, Harrison's headquarters.
When rumor of a British attack on Fort Stephenson circulated, William traded in his drum for a musket and went with the fort's relief.
A company member, Samuel Thurman, was the only member of the fort's garrison killed. Thurman was in the blockhouse and was determined to shoot a Redcoat. he climbed on top of the blockhouse and peered over when a six pound ball took off his head.
--Brock-Perry
In June 1812, they were at Fort Meigs and in July at Fort Seneca, Harrison's headquarters.
When rumor of a British attack on Fort Stephenson circulated, William traded in his drum for a musket and went with the fort's relief.
A company member, Samuel Thurman, was the only member of the fort's garrison killed. Thurman was in the blockhouse and was determined to shoot a Redcoat. he climbed on top of the blockhouse and peered over when a six pound ball took off his head.
--Brock-Perry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)